What Wins Produced Says and What it Does Not Say

I posted the following last June.  Unfortunately I made the mistake of giving it the title: What Wins Produced Says and What it Doesn’t Say.   Apparently, you can’t use the word “Doesn’t” in the title.  Now when I link to this story the link won’t work.  So I am re-posting so that in the future when I discuss Wins Produced I can refer readers to this post. 

The NBA tracks a variety of statistics to measure a player’s performance on the court.  NBA fans are familiar with points scored, rebounds, steals, assists, turnovers, blocked shots, etc… The difficulty with these statistics is that some players excel at some aspects of the game, but not at others.  And what we want to know when confronted with players with different skills is how each player impacts the final outcome we observe on the court.

The approach we took in The Wages of Wins is simply to utilize regression analysis – a common technique in economics – to determine the relative impact of each statistics on team wins.  We had three objectives in constructing our model.  Ultimately we wanted a measure that was simple, complete, and accurate.  In the end, we think each of these objectives was met.   The Wins Produced model is not hard to understand, it incorporates each of the statistics tracked for individual players, and it connects accurately to team wins.

With the Wins Produced model one can begin with a player’s statistics – his points, shot attempts, rebounds, steals, turnovers, etc.. – and translate these into how many wins those statistics creates.  And with this measure we can tell three basic stories about talent evaluation in the NBA. 

  • Players who do many things well – like Michael Jordan, LeBron James, Shaquille O’Neal, Tim Duncan, and Kevin Garnett – are very productive players, just like most people believe. 
  • Players who only score, though, or have deficiencies in their game (i.e. low shooting efficiency, high turnover rates) – like Allen Iverson, Antoine Walker, and Carmelo Anthony – are not as productive as people believe.
  • Players who are prolific rebounders – like Dennis Rodman, Ben Wallace, and Marcus Camby – are more productive than people tend to believe.

Now it is important to understand what Wins Produced says, and what it doesn’t say.  Specifically, Wins Produced tells us how productive a player has been.  It does not, though, tell us why that player is productive.  This is a point we made in the following excerpt from The Wages of Wins.

p. 125 in The Wages of Wins 

One cannot end the analysis when one has measured the value of player performance. Knowing the value of each player is only the starting point of analysis. The next step is determining why the player is productive or unproductive. In our view, this is where coaching should begin. We think we can offer a reasonable measure of a player’s productivity. Although we have offered some insights into why players are productive, ultimately this question can only be answered by additional scrutiny into the construction of a team and the roles a player plays on the floor.

The Wins Produced measure does not replace the insights of coaching and NBA analysts.  What it does is correct flaws in the evaluation of talent in The Association.  Players who do not shoot efficiently, or turn the ball over frequently, do not help a team win many games.  Players who can accumulate large numbers of rebounds can indeed have a large impact on final outcomes.  Of course, why a player shoots inefficiently, commits turnovers, or rebounds well, is not a question Wins Produced will answer. 

In The Wages of Wins we do explore some factors that cause players to perform better or worse.  For example, we spend some time discussing how a player with more productive teammates will tend to be less productive.  Or low levels of roster turnover – specifically, keeping a team together – will cause a player’s performance to improve.

And we did consider other issues with respect to player performance – and if you wish to see these please read the book.  Or just wait.  At the rate we’re going, we might eventually get the entire book on-line, one excerpt at a time.

– DJ

154 thoughts on “What Wins Produced Says and What it Does Not Say

  1. Pingback: Pistol Pete — An Early Answer « The Wages of Wins Journal

  2. Pingback: The Story of the Human Eraser « The Wages of Wins Journal

  3. Pingback: How to Lose Your Best Player and Win a Title « The Wages of Wins Journal

  4. Pingback: Connecting Seattle Past to Seattle Present « The Wages of Wins Journal

  5. Pingback: The Best Suns Team « The Wages of Wins Journal

  6. Pingback: The Rising Rockets? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  7. Pingback: Reviewing the Northwest Division « The Wages of Wins Journal

  8. Pingback: The Missing MVP « The Wages of Wins Journal

  9. A question about your methodology. You use a large number of factors to determine a player’s worth. Why not follow the hockey method for determining worth and look at plus-minus? I don’t think basketball even keeps that statistic. All you have to do is determine whether a given player is contributing more or less than the team average to the team’s plus-minus. For example, if a player is a Plus 4, and the Team is a Plus 6, that means the player is contributing less than the rest of his team, on average. All this talk of rebounds, scoring, steals, and blocks is really meaningless, isn’t it? Isn’t the important stat the simplest one: i.e. whether a player is contributing to a team scoring more than the opponents? And who cares what he is doing to accomplish that. Maybe he is the best pick-setter in the league. Anyway, I do not follow basketball, but I find this obsession with individualstatistics curious but in the end rather limiting. — Michael

  10. Pingback: The Underrated in 2007-08 « The Wages of Wins Journal

  11. Pingback: Game Four Thoughts: Ray Allen for MVP « The Wages of Wins Journal

  12. Pingback: Okafor Finally Signs « The Wages of Wins Journal

  13. Pingback: At Least We Have the Bucks « The Wages of Wins Journal

  14. Pingback: The Winner Within Miami « The Wages of Wins Journal

  15. Pingback: The Best Failure Ever? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  16. Pingback: Beat LA? Dream On « The Wages of Wins Journal

  17. Pingback: Contending on New Years Day « The Wages of Wins Journal

  18. Pingback: Brotherly Link Love 1-12-09

  19. Pingback: King James and Kobe « The Wages of Wins Journal

  20. Pingback: Back to Battier « The Wages of Wins Journal

  21. Pingback: Helping the Least Productive Number One Pick « The Wages of Wins Journal

  22. Pingback: Self-Inflicted Wounds in Sacramento « The Wages of Wins Journal

  23. Pingback: The Billups Trade As It Was, As It Is Imagined, and As It Can Be « The Wages of Wins Journal

  24. Pingback: Can Starbury Help Boston Repeat? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  25. Pingback: When can Barack Obama Legitimately Visit with the Bulls in the White House? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  26. Pingback: The Miller Metric and Finding Talent in Utah « The Wages of Wins Journal

  27. Pingback: Playoff Basketball in Charlotte? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  28. Pingback: The Cost of Throwing Away Free Throws « The Wages of Wins Journal

  29. Pingback: The Same Three Year Gasol Plan in Memphis « The Wages of Wins Journal

  30. Pingback: Bob Newhart, Danny Granger, and Group Therapy in Indiana « The Wages of Wins Journal

  31. Pingback: An Instant Analysis of the 2009 NCAA Tournament « The Wages of Wins Journal

  32. Pingback: Drafting Auerbach « The Wages of Wins Journal

  33. Pingback: Aging Billups and Telling Stories « The Wages of Wins Journal

  34. Pingback: Yes, the Knicks have Improved « The Wages of Wins Journal

  35. Pingback: There is Not Much Difference Between Danny Granger and Kobe Bryant? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  36. Pingback: Which Dunleavy Has Underperformed? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  37. Pingback: Greg Oden or Kevin Durant? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  38. Pingback: Assisted Thoughts « The Wages of Wins Journal

  39. Pingback: San Antonio Moves from Possible Contender to a Likely Early Vacation « The Wages of Wins Journal

  40. Pingback: Marvin Webster Passes Away « The Wages of Wins Journal

  41. Pingback: The Other Better Bynum « The Wages of Wins Journal

  42. Pingback: An Award for Joel Przybilla? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  43. Pingback: Looking Again at Implicit Bias in the NBA « The Wages of Wins Journal

  44. Pingback: Picking the First Round of the 2009 NBA Playoffs « The Wages of Wins Journal

  45. Pingback: The Bottom 10% and One Big Reason Why the Celtics are Having Problems « The Wages of Wins Journal

  46. Pingback: Jamal Crawford is Unlucky? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  47. Pingback: Thoughts on the 2009 NFL Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal

  48. Pingback: An Average Rose « The Wages of Wins Journal

  49. Pingback: How Sportswriters are Like Coaches: Explaining the Vote for Rookie of the Year « The Wages of Wins Journal

  50. Pingback: Picking the Second Round of the 2009 NBA Playoffs « The Wages of Wins Journal

  51. Pingback: How About a Few More MVP Votes for Chris Paul? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  52. Pingback: The MVP on Each Team and a Comparison of Kobe and Flash « The Wages of Wins Journal

  53. Pingback: Danny Granger is the Most Improved? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  54. Pingback: The WoW All-NBA Teams « The Wages of Wins Journal

  55. Pingback: Picking the Conference Finals and Playoff Science « The Wages of Wins Journal

  56. Pingback: Has Glen ‘Big Baby’ Davis played his way out of Boston? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  57. Pingback: Ranking Every Player in the History of the Utah Jazz « The Wages of Wins Journal

  58. Pingback: A Comment on the NBA Draft and Some Cutting and Pasting « The Wages of Wins Journal

  59. Pingback: Ranking Every Player for the Boston Celtics since 1977 « The Wages of Wins Journal

  60. Pingback: Ranking Every Player in the History of the Los Angeles Lakers since 1977 « The Wages of Wins Journal

  61. Pingback: Fooled by Randomness, the NBA Playoffs, and the TrueHoop Smackdown « The Wages of Wins Journal

  62. Pingback: Superman, Shaq, Magic History, and Reader Comments « The Wages of Wins Journal

  63. Pingback: Evaluating Jordan Hill « The Wages of Wins Journal

  64. Pingback: Superstar Search in the NBA Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal

  65. Pingback: Winning the TrueHoop Stat Geek Smackdown « The Wages of Wins Journal

  66. Pingback: Pondering Potential First Round Point Guards « The Wages of Wins Journal

  67. Pingback: Trading Before the Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal

  68. Pingback: Quick Thoughts on the 2009 NBA Draft « The Wages of Wins Journal

  69. Pingback: Detroit Refuses Rondo? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  70. Pingback: Gordon and Villanueva? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  71. Pingback: Artest for Ariza? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  72. Pingback: An Interesting Path Back To Contention for the Mavericks « The Wages of Wins Journal

  73. Pingback: Dashing Hope in Toronto « The Wages of Wins Journal

  74. Pingback: Should Kuester Rent or Buy? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  75. Pingback: The Reasons to Sign Iverson « The Wages of Wins Journal

  76. Pingback: The Magic and Pistons Go Different Directions « The Wages of Wins Journal

  77. Pingback: Who was the Most Overrated in 2008-09? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  78. Pingback: Beasley or Boozer? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  79. Pingback: What if Don Nelson Embraced Tradition? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  80. Pingback: Is this the Year a Charlotte Basketball Team – and MJ – Return to the Playoffs? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  81. Pingback: What About Orlando? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  82. Pingback: Previewing the Year of the Super Teams « The Wages of Wins Journal

  83. Pingback: The Fabled Year of the Super Teams and the Somewhat Struggling Spurs « The Wages of Wins Journal

  84. Pingback: Maybe It Is Time to Stop Blaming the Coach in Toronto « The Wages of Wins Journal

  85. Pingback: The Impact of Losing Greg Oden « The Wages of Wins Journal

  86. Pingback: Big Ben Cannot Save Detroit from Ugh! « The Wages of Wins Journal

  87. Pingback: Pointing Fingers at the Miami Heat « The Wages of Wins Journal

  88. Pingback: Boston or LA? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  89. Pingback: The Rockets Surprise « The Wages of Wins Journal

  90. Pingback: Lawson Regrets and the Amazing Tyreke Evans « The Wages of Wins Journal

  91. Pingback: A Quick Note on Aging in the NBA « The Wages of Wins Journal

  92. Pingback: A Quick Note on the Trail Blazers Rash of Injuries « The Wages of Wins Journal

  93. Pingback: Correlation, Causation, and Jamal Crawford « The Wages of Wins Journal

  94. Pingback: A Costanza Trade for Joe Dumars « The Wages of Wins Journal

  95. Pingback: Explaining the Disappointing Wizards « The Wages of Wins Journal

  96. Pingback: Statistical certainty-draft « No Time to Read

  97. Pingback: Stumbling on Wins in Memphis « The Wages of Wins Journal

  98. Pingback: Are the Spurs Still Title Contenders? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  99. Pingback: Revisiting LaMarcus Aldridge for Tyrus Thomas « The Wages of Wins Journal

  100. Pingback: Who Besides Ed Stefanski Should be Unhappy in Philadelphia? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  101. Pingback: A History Lesson from Detroit that is Repeated « The Wages of Wins Journal

  102. Pingback: Mixed Messages on Chris Bosh « The Wages of Wins Journal

  103. Pingback: The Shooting Guard Penalty « The Wages of Wins Journal

  104. Pingback: Who is not MVP in 2010? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  105. Pingback: Disagreeing with Doug Moe « The Wages of Wins Journal

  106. Pingback: Every Team and Player at the Midpoint of the 2009-10 Season « The Wages of Wins Journal

  107. Pingback: Jonny Flynn Makes His Choices and Ty Lawson Has to Stay Home « The Wages of Wins Journal

  108. Pingback: Is Derrick Rose Already a Star? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  109. Pingback: The Top 6th Man after 41 games « The Wages of Wins Journal

  110. Pingback: The Most Improved after 41 Games « The Wages of Wins Journal

  111. Pingback: Are the Nets the Worst Team Ever? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  112. Pingback: What is Wrong with the Boston Celtics? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  113. Pingback: A Red Flag on the Wall « The Wages of Wins Journal

  114. Pingback: Stars, Snubs, and Scoring « The Wages of Wins Journal

  115. Pingback: Dallas Makes a Contending Move « The Wages of Wins Journal

  116. Pingback: Marcus Camby and the Charging Blazers « The Wages of Wins Journal

  117. Pingback: Very Quick Thoughts on the McGrady and Martin Trade « The Wages of Wins Journal

  118. Pingback: Are the Current Knicks Worth Watching? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  119. Pingback: Ronnie Brewer Learns to Stop Listening to His Coach « The Wages of Wins Journal

  120. Pingback: Evaluating the Messages Dwyane Wade Sent at the All-Star Break « The Wages of Wins Journal

  121. Pingback: Why are the Bucks not Horrible? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  122. Pingback: Where Would the Pistons Be Without Big Ben? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  123. Pingback: Darko Milicic Now Benefits from Very Low Expectations « The Wages of Wins Journal

  124. Pingback: Kevin Durant vs. Carmelo Anthony « The Wages of Wins Journal

  125. Pingback: John Hollinger, Dean Oliver, and Some Other People Comment on Plus/Minus « The Wages of Wins Journal

  126. Pingback: A Short Post on the Hornets « The Wages of Wins Journal

  127. Pingback: Imagine Hasheem Thabeet using WP48 to defend his NBA career « The Wages of Wins Journal

  128. Pingback: The Wall Street Journal Looks for Teams that Make the Nets Look Good « The Wages of Wins Journal

  129. Pingback: Assigning Blame in Atlanta and Boston « The Wages of Wins Journal

  130. Pingback: Kobe Makes Pau Gasol Unhappy « The Wages of Wins Journal

  131. Pingback: Clyde Drexler and Kobe Bryant: The Second Best Career « The Wages of Wins Journal

  132. Pingback: The Al Harrington Market « The Wages of Wins Journal

  133. Pingback: The Record Setting Bobcats « The Wages of Wins Journal

  134. Pingback: Could it Be a Magical Summer in Orlando? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  135. Pingback: The Final Four Winners « The Wages of Wins Journal

  136. Pingback: Five Questions — and Perhaps Some Answers — on the Milwaukee Bucks « The Wages of Wins Journal

  137. Pingback: The Wheel of Fortune Turns on Don Nelson « The Wages of Wins Journal

  138. Pingback: Dennis Johnson in the Hall of Fame? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  139. Pingback: Some Cavalier Questions and Answers « The Wages of Wins Journal

  140. Pingback: Is Hedo Turkoglu a Disappointment? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  141. Pingback: Corey Brewer Misperceptions « The Wages of Wins Journal

  142. Pingback: Amazing NBA Seasons and How Love Can Make Your Team Better « The Wages of Wins Journal

  143. Pingback: Aaron Brooks is Not the MIP in 2009-10 « The Wages of Wins Journal

  144. Pingback: Carmelo Anthony Says He Needs Help « The Wages of Wins Journal

  145. Pingback: A Familiar Award Story « The Wages of Wins Journal

  146. Pingback: Another Familiar Award Story? « The Wages of Wins Journal

  147. Pingback: Answers and More Answers from the Freakonomics Q&A « The Wages of Wins Journal

  148. Pingback: The MVP Vote and Endorsing Conventional Wisdom « The Wages of Wins Journal

  149. Pingback: Finally Wins Produced Has Been Automated « The Wages of Wins Journal

  150. Pingback: The WoW All-NBA Team and the jbrett Codes Again « The Wages of Wins Journal

  151. Pingback: Why another Pistons blog? | Pistons by the Numbers

  152. Pingback: One Down, 74 To Go: Miami Heat Beat Philadelphia 76ers For Their First Win | NBA Rock

  153. Pingback: Why are the Sixers not Awful? | The Wages of Wins Journal

  154. Pingback: Pistons roundtable: Wildcard questions « PistonPowered

Leave a Reply