The teams considered playoff contenders in the Western Conference include Portland, the LA Lakers, San Antonio, Dallas, Denver, New Orleans, Utah, and maybe Phoenix (and maybe Golden State). With the exception of Phoenix (and Golden State), all these teams made the playoffs in 2009. Only one Western Conference playoff team – the Houston Rockets – are generally omitted from the list of 2009-10 contenders.
The Rockets were dropped from the list when it was learned Yao Ming would miss the next season. Coupled with the injury to Tracy McGrady, the Rockets now face the prospect of entering the next season without a “star” player. Here is how Chris Mannix describes the team in Sports Illustrated: Houston is now a pale imitation of the team that took the Lakers to seven games in the Western Conference semifinals.
Mannix goes on offer the following quite from Daryl Morey: “When the previews come out, we’ll probably be in the back of the magazines, under the cologne ads.”
In John Hollinger’s preview at ESPN.com (insider access required), ten teams are listed ahead of the Rockets. And when I listed the contenders earlier in the week, the Rockets were ignored.
The Above Average Rockets
Then I looked at the following list of veteran players who should play for the Rockets this season.
Luis Scola: 2,448 min., 9.8 Wins Produced, 0.189 WP48
Shane Battier: 2,031 min., 6.2 Wins Produced, 0.147 WP48
Trevor Ariza: 1,998 min., 8.0 Wins Produced, 0.192 WP48
Aaron Brooks: 1,998 min., -0.5 Wins Produced, -0.012 WP48
Carl Landry: 1,467 min., 5.4 Wins Produced, 0.175 WP48
Chuck Hayes: 858 min., 2.5 Wins Produced, 0.139 WP48
Brent Barry: 857 min., 2.0 Wins Produced, 0.113 WP48
Kyle Lowry: 608 min., 2.3 Wins Produced, 0.182 WP48
An average NBA player posts a 0.100 WP48. Of the eight players listed above, seven were above average last season.
The Wins Produced from these players sum to 39.7. The minutes, though, only sum 13,486. An NBA team that avoids overtime will play 19,680 minutes in a season. Consequently, it seems likely some (if not all) of these players will play more minutes in 2009-10. And if per-minute performance doesn’t change (an issue I will address at the end of this column), increasing the minutes of these players (except for Brooks) will lead to more than 40 wins.
The eighth seed in the West last year won 48 games. So if the West is the same in 2009-10, the Rockets will have to come closer to 50 wins to make the playoffs. This may be difficult. But I am suggesting – contrary to the perceptions of this team – that it’s possible the Rockets can make the playoffs without McGrady or Ming.
A Collection of Non-Scorers
Once again, perceptions say this is not possible. When we look at the scoring of the above eight players we can see why expectations are so low.
Luis Scola: 12.7 Points per game, 20.1 Points per 48 minutes
Shane Battier: 7.3 Points per game, 10.3 Points per 48 minutes
Trevor Ariza: 8.9 Points per game, 17.5 Points per 48 minutes
Aaron Brooks: 11.2 Points per game, 21.5 Points per 48 minutes
Carl Landry: 9.2 Points per game, 20.9 Points per 48 minutes
Chuck Hayes: 1.3 Points per game, 5.1 Points per 48 minutes
Brent Barry: 3.7 Points per game, 11.6 Points per 48 minutes
Kyle Lowry: 7.6 Points per game, 16.9 Points per 48 minutes
Scola leads this group with 12.7 points per game. When we turn to scoring per 48 minutes we see only three players who exceed the league average of 19.8. Scoring drives perceptions in the NBA, and the lack of scoring numbers from this group suggests the Rockets are doomed.
But wins are about more than scoring. And when we measure these players contributions to wins (via Wins Produced), we see that Houston has fewer problems than people believe. Consequently, I think it’s possible that Morey’s considerable reputation is about to become further enhanced.
If the Rockets do make the playoffs without McGrady and Ming, the following will also occur:
- Morey is going to be considered for Executive of the Year
- Rick Adelman will be considered for Coach of the Year
- Aaron Brooks – who may lead this team in scoring – will be considered one of the best point guards in the game.
All of this is possible because this collection of non-scorers is also a collection of above average performers. Unfortunately, it seems likely that none of the non-scorers will get much credit if this team exceeds expectations.
Let me close by noting that the seven above average performers listed above have a history of productive play. For example, consider the recent history of these players.
2007-08: 4.8 Wins Produced, 0.113 WP48
2007-08: 6.5 Wins Produced, 0.107 WP48
2006-07: 6.4 Wins Produced, 0.103 WP48
2007-08: 2.6 Wins Produced, 0.225 WP48
2006-07: 5.8 Wins Produced, 0.217 WP48
2007-08: 0.3 Wins Produced, 0.020 WP48
2007-08: 4.3 Wins Produced, 0.292 WP48
2007-08: 6.7 Wins Produced, 0.206 WP48
2006-07: 7.8 Wins Produced, 0.217 WP48
2007-08: 2.7 Wins Produced, 0.231 WP48
2006-07: 7.7 Wins Produced, 0.225 WP48
2007-08: 4.3 Wins Produced, 0.101 WP48
With the exception of Aaron Brooks, these players were above average before 2008-09. This suggests that these players will be above average in 2009-10. If that happens, the Rockets have a good chance of being an above average team. That means the Western Conference might have as many as ten teams contending for eight playoff spots. And I haven’t even thought much about the Clippers, Thunder, Kings, Grizzlies, or T-Wolves (okay, I have thought about the T-Wolves).
The WoW Journal Comments Policy
Our research on the NBA was summarized HERE.
Wins Produced, Win Score, and PAWSmin are also discussed in the following posts:
Finally, A Guide to Evaluating Models contains useful hints on how to interpret and evaluate statistical models.