Q&A with 3 Shades of Blue, Opposing Views, and More Reviews

Across the past few weeks I have participated in a number of Q&A sessions.  The process for each was as follows:  A number of questions were sent along and then I spent some time thinking about my answers.

Chip Crain – of 3 Shades of Blue – has just posted another Q&A (see Interview with David Berri – Author of “Stumbling on Wins”).  The approach, though, was a bit different.  Rather than send all the questions at once, Chip spent several days sending me one or two questions at a time.  Often I would answer these questions fairly quickly, resulting in a Q&A that really was just a conversation about our book and the state of the Memphis Grizzlies.  Once again, I encourage everyone to click on over to this Q&A and leave a comment (or two or three).

Posting at Opposing Views

Opposing Views has started a sports section and will be posting stories from the Wages of Wins Journal. So far, four stories – originally posted here – have been re-posted.  If you click on each story below you can see what the posts in this forum would look like if a) we had a qualified editor and b) we had someone willing to add pictures to the story.  In other words, Opposing View is making what is posted here look professional.

David Berri’s First-Round NBA Playoff Forecast

‘Meaningless’ Scoring Plagues End of NBA Season

NBA Player Analysis: Minnesota Timberwolves’ Corey Brewer

Is Raptors Hedo Turkoglu a Disappointment?

Many More Reviews

And now for something that I really enjoy reading (that may not be as entertaining for everyone else).  A number of reviews have been posted on Stumbling on Wins.  What follows are a few that I found from At the Hive, Hornets247, CelticsHub, Hot Hot Hoops, and Owen Breck (writer at both Knickerblogger and frequent commentator in this forum).   It is unlikely that anyone will enjoy these reviews as much as I do, but nevertheless, I hope everyone finds these reactions interesting. 

At the Hive Review

The statistical revolution in sports has swept across the NBA world in recent years. While it hasn’t reached Major League Baseball’s level yet- where most teams reportedly hire advanced statistical scouting- the work of many in the APBR community has not gone unnoticed.

Sports economist and statistician David Berri (who we interviewed way back in the day) was kind enough to send along some hardcover copies of his latest book, Stumbling on Wins. Without a doubt, it’s one of those books you read cover to cover without putting down, and whether or not you agree with every sentence, it makes you re-evaluate the way you watch any given play in basketball (or really, any other sport). 

I can’t emphasize how accessible it is to the average sports fan either; while everything is statistically grounded, there’s nothing too number-y about it.

Hornets247 Review by Ryan Schwan

First and foremost, you have to understand that Berri and Schmidt are economists.  Their focus isn’t on coming up with a tool to ranking players for overall effectiveness, but instead on using available measurement tools to identify cost efficiencies and minimizing financial risks.  Their work aspires to be similar to the Moneyball sort of work that has impacted Major League Baseball’s player evaluation so heavily.  The premise of that work?  Identifying cost efficiencies using tools that can predict player production in the future.  Unsurprisingly then, that is also is the focus of Stumbling on Wins: using predictable measures to evaluate players and how they are paid. 

It is generally true that player production in the NBA are predictable over time.(See the unvarying David West) In their book, Berri and Schmidt detail the types of production that are more predictable than others.  Armed with this information, the authors then use a series of fascinating tables to list the factors that have significant impacts on player salary and then compare them to predictable production factors.  The two lists do not line up – or even come close.  In fact, the two tables show that many of the predictable factors have very little impact on salary, while several significantly unpredictable factors(pure scoring numbers primarily) have a tremendous impact on salary.  That disconnect – between predictability and player salary – is the basic failure of logic Schmidt and Berri are trying to illustrate, and they present a compelling argument.

Here’s how I would put the situation the illustrate into a business world scenario:  Over the course of a year, I work on five projects.  On three of those projects, I am the team lead and a key resource, but the projects are for smaller clients.   On the other two, I am part of a large team, and just a small part of the whole, but the projects are for big clients.  My manager knows how each project turns  out.  In order to be apply the logic of an average NBA GM, it appears my manager would ignore or take into little account the outcomes of the smaller client projects, while basing my review, salary increase and bonus on the outcomes of the larger client projects.  That, however, doesn’t really make sense.  The smaller projects reflect my personal abilities more realistically than the larger projects do.  Yet Berri and Schmidt’s book illustrates that this is pretty close to what average General Managers do every day.

The book as a whole contains many nuggets of fascinating information.  It’s also small and a fast read. My only quibble is that a couple of the chapters are a bit like shooting fish in a barrel.  Using Isiah Thomas’s tenure as GM in New York to illustrate an incompetent GM or taking black quarterbacks in the NFL and showing that they are underpaid and underappreciated is a bit like taking the Yugo and attempting to prove it was a bad car.  Those cases are so obvious, and the failures so grand, that those chapters lack any of the shock or surprise that inspire people to think differently about things.  They are still fun, though.  Unless you’re a Knicks fan.  Or Black.  I’ll move on now.

I do wonder at one thing, however.  One of the primary criticisms of the WP48 and Wins Produced statistics that I’ve seen from other statisticians was the seemingly inordinate focus on rebounding and lesser focus on scoring numbers.  Elite rebounders show better in WP48 than in any other general player evaluation statistic.  This book, however, gives me an inkling as to why this is:

If Berri and Schmidt want their evaluation tool – WP48 and wins Produced – to be used in a similar fashion as the Moneyball factors in the MLB to evaluate players, then they would want it to take into account risk.  One of the most risky production factors to pin salary decisions on is pure scoring numbers.  Those numbers can go up and down, and have a small correlation to what has happened in the past.  Rebounding, however, is predictable over time.(as are a few other stats that weigh heavily in WP48)  A player who is an elite rebounder this year is very likely to be one next year.  So if you are deciding where to spend your resources – limited by a salary cap – and you are using WP48 as a primary evaluation tool, Berri and Schmidt appear to have already built in risk management into the tool – it will rate those players whose numbers shouldn’t change more highly than many of those who could see strong variance.

Limiting risk.  Economists to the core.  I’ll leave it to you to decide if that is a good or bad thing.

Review by CelticsHub by Brendan Jackson

Do you like to read?  Do you like advanced statistics explained to you clearly using real-life examples from your favorite sports?  Do you like winning free stuff?

If you answered “Yes” or “Hell Yes” to any of these questions, this contest is for you.  Economists/statisticians/authors David Berri and Martin Schmidt (The Wages of Wins) have written their second book and want to give it away to basketball fans.  Stumbling On Wins is currently on sale now at your local, national, and online bookstores, but Berri, Schmidt, and Financial Times Press have also provided the TrueHoop Network with copies of the book to give away to our loyal readers.  Right now, CelticsHub is set to give away four copies.

I am no stat geek, but I am thoroughly enjoying this read and am now encouraged to go out and buy their first book, The Wages of Wins, once I am done with Stumbling.

Review from Hot Hot Hoops by Surya Fernandez

It’s likely a given that you’re the smartest and most well-informed NBA fan in your inner circle if you’re reading this blog as well as all the other great work put out daily on our ESPN Truehoop Network. Now it’s your chance to prove your worth among all of our readers and put your analytical skills to the test. And what better reward (besides bragging rights) than to win a copy of the brand new book Stumbling On Wins written by professors of economics Dave Berri and Martin Schmidt? Friends of the Truehoop network and the writers of the excellent WofW Journal, Berri and Schmidt follow up on their first book Wages of Wins with an examination of the sports industry through the prism of behavioral economics. So it’s not just a fancy book filled with numbers that will make your head spin, it’s an examination of the psychology behind the economic decisions made by sports teams and what statistics are overrated and which ones really do help a team make informed decisions. So if you’ve ever wondered why general managers, coaches and execs in sports make the questionable judgements that they do then this is required reading.

Review from Owen Breck

Reading the previous offering from these two authors, The Wages of Wins, had a profound impact on me. As a Knicks fans and a lifelong lover of basketball, I was perhaps uniquely primed for their message, but it was nevertheless a real revelation to see the empirical case made that scoring is overvalued in the NBA and that decision makers make systematic errors rather than incorporating all the information available to them. Watching Isiah Thomas operate after reading the book was as fascinating as it was painful and sparked me to take a serious and very rewarding interest in the use of advanced statistics in basketball and other sports as well.

Needless to say, I have been excited for a long time about the arrival of their second book. Stumbling on Wins definitely didn’t disappoint. I picked it up and didn’t put it down before finishing it. It is immensely readable and very entertaining, full of the kind of sports stories that make it very clear there is ample room for improvement at the top or your favorite franchise and plenty of insight into human behavior to be garnered from a study of sports. It really builds and improves on their first book by focusing on the core insight about irrationality in human decisionmaking and by drawing on many different sports to illustrate the point.

For both casual and serious sports fans, I think this will be a very enjoyable read which should deepen your understanding and enjoyment of sports for the long term. I guarantee you won’t look at any of the decisions made by your local sports franchises in quite the same way again. Highly recommended.

- DJ

The WoW Journal Comments Policy

Back to Stumbling on Wins Promotion Week

Okay, the third contest didn’t work out so well.  To refresh everyone’s memory this was the contest: The season ends on Wednesday.  Which player — from all the games that will be played — will post the highest Position Adjusted Win Score on Wednesday?  Please give the name and your guess for Position Adjusted Win Score.   The person who guesses the name and comes the closest to guessing the correct PAWS will win a signed copy of Stumbling on Wins.

Here were the guesses with the corresponding PAWS from Wednesday’s game:

  • Stephen Curry: 18.2
  • Kevin Durant: 12.7
  • Joakim Noah: 6.5
  • Dwight Howard: 6.4
  • Jason Kidd: 5.7
  • Deron Williams: 5.7
  • David Lee: 1.4
  • Dirk Nowitzki: -3.6
  • Marcus Camby: DNP
  • Manu Ginobili: DNP
  • Chris Paul: DNP
  • Dwyane Wade: DNP

Of these guesses, Stephen Curry was the top player.  But although this was an amazing guess, Curry was not the winning guess.  To win this contest you needed to guess… DeJuan Blair.  Blair posted a 19.6 PAWS on Wednesday night. 

So unlike the first two contests – where a winner was found very quickly – our third contest will not have a winner.   This means we need another contest.  And here it is:   

There are four NBA playoff games on Sunday involving Orlando, Charlotte, Oklahoma City, LA Lakers, San Antonio, Dallas, Portland, and Phoenix.  Which player – in these games – will post the highest PAWS?  Please give a name and also your guess for the player’s PAWS in Sunday’s game.  Here is a hint:  It is not going to be Brandon Roy.

Whoever get this right (assuming somebody does) will get an autographed copy of Stumbling on Wins.   

In addition to this contest, let me remind everyone that Financial Times Press – the publisher of Stumbling on Wins – has essentially declared this week “Stumbling on Wins Promotion Week.”   When you purchase Stumbling on Wins from 4/12 – 4/18, you’re entitled to access to a free bonus article – more than 2,000 words in length — on the NBA Draft.  Simply forward a copy of your dated receipt to StumblingonWins@Gmail.com.  A PDF version of the article will be forwarded to your inbox.

And for those looking to more chances to win a free copy, let me remind everyone that each of the following blogs – via a variety of contests – are scheduled to give away multiple copies of our book this week. Some of these contests are certainly still going on, so click around and see if you can win.  

48 Minutes of Hell

8 Points, 9 Seconds

Advanced NFL Stats from Brian Burke

At the Hive

Bucksketball

Cavs the Blog

Celtics Hub

Clipperblog

Courtside Analyst

Cowbell Kingdom

Daily Thunder

Denver Stiffs

Hardwood Paroxysm

Harvard Sports Analysis Collective

Hoopinionblog

Hornets247

Hot Hot Hoops

Howlin’ T-Wolf

Knickerblogger

NetsAreScorching

PistonPowered

QueenCityHoops

RaptorsHQ

Sabernomics

Shades of Blue

The Painted Area

The Two Man Game

TigerTales

Truth About It

Valley of the Suns

Warriors World

And once again, we would like to thank all of these blogs for participating in this promotion.  Its been interesting to see all the contests people have created to give away copies of our book.

- DJ

 The WoW Journal Comments Policy

Our research on the NBA was summarized HERE.

The Technical Notes at wagesofwins.com provides substantially more information on the published research behind Wins Produced and Win Score

Wins Produced, Win Score, and PAWSmin are also discussed in the following posts:

Simple Models of Player Performance

Wins Produced vs. Win Score

What Wins Produced Says and What It Does Not Say

Introducing PAWSmin — and a Defense of Box Score Statistics

Finally, A Guide to Evaluating Models contains useful hints on how to interpret and evaluate statistical models.

My First Round Playoff Forecast for TrueHoop

Let me start with a protest.  This year has two complications.  First, most of the teams – especially in the Western Conference – are not very different.  Secondly – and this is where my protest comes in – the quality of teams is going to be influenced by the health of several key players.  For example…

  • will the Lakers get Andrew Bynum back and how healthy is Kobe Bryant?
  • is Kenyon Martin (and/or J.R. Smith) healthy enough to contribute for the Nuggets?
  • how seriously are the injuries to Carlos Boozer and Andrei Kirilenko?
  • can Brandon Roy make any contribution for the Trail Blazers?
  • how much can Shaq contribute in Cleveland?

The answer to some of these questions will impact who someone should favor in each series.  But as of Thursday afternoon, I’m not sure we know the answers.

Nevertheless, the picks are due today, so here it goes.  The model is the same one employed last year.  The outcome of each series is a function of each team’s efficiency differential (offensive efficiency minus defensive efficiency) and home court advantage.

With model in hand, here are my picks:

Eastern Conference

Cleveland over Chicago (4-0)

This one is fairly easy.  Cleveland’s 6.9 efficiency differential easily trumps Chicago’s mark of -1.7.  Even without a healthy Shaq, the Cavaliers should be favored.

Orlando over Charlotte (4-1)

Again, this is fairly easy. Charlotte has improved.  But Orlando was the best team in the NBA this season (according to efficiency differential).  And in the second half their differential was 13.1 (that’s a mark similar to what the Bulls posted in 1995-96).  So Orlando should advance easily.

Atlanta over Milwaukee (4-1)

This one should have been much closer.  But Andrew Bogut’s injury really hurts the Bucks.  So the Hawks should advance.

Boston over Miami (4-3)

This is the hardest one to forecast in the Eastern Conference.  If we go with second-half numbers, the Heat should be favored.  But I am going to stick with each team’s differential for the season (even if I think that exaggerates the quality of the Celtics today).  Of all my Eastern Conference picks, this one I would expect to be wrong.

Western Conference

LA Lakers over Oklahoma City (4-2)

Only four playoff teams posted a lower efficiency differential than the Lakers in the second half of the season. But Oklahoma City was one of those four (the other three were Boston, Charlotte, and Chicago).  So the Lakers – even with Bynum out – should advance.  After the first round, though, life will only get harder for the Lakers.

San Antonio over Dallas (4-3)

This is a very tough series to call.  Dallas has home court. But San Antonio was the better team – in terms of differential – the entire season.  I am going to give the edge to San Antonio, although my call requires that the Spurs win the last game of the series in Dallas.

Phoenix over Portland (4-1)

I don’t think Portland is going to get much from Roy.  And Phoenix was the better team this year.  So I think Phoenix advances. If Portland was completely healthy, though, I might be tempted to take the Blazers.

Denver over Utah (4-3)

If we look at the entire season, Utah posted a slightly higher differential than the Nuggets.  But Denver has home court, so they get the nod.  If we focus on the second half numbers, though, I would pick Utah.  Then again, Utah has two key players who are hurt.  Then again, Denver may not have a healthy Martin. Then again, Martin really isn’t that productive.  Then again… oh hell, I am picking the Nuggets in seven.  But this is a toss-up (then again, maybe it isn’t).

Okay, those are my picks.  These are really not made with much confidence.  All I can say is… really, I don’t have much space on my office wall for another banner.  So if I don’t win, I am okay with that (see, I already have my excuse ready).

- DJ

The WoW Journal Comments Policy

Taking Questions at Freakonomics

Freakonomics.com often posts questions and answers with authors and today it is our turn.  So if you have a question, please post it at Freakonomics.com. In a few days our answers will be posted. 

In other news…

Once again I am taking part in the True Hoop Stat Geek Smackdown.   I am the defending champion in this contest.  But like the Lakers, I am not sure my reign is going to last very long.  Many teams are not separated by much.  And with all the injuries to key players, this is going to be a difficult post-season to predict.

Our third contest here — for an autographed copy of Stumbling on Wins — has also been completed.  I still need to look at the numbers to see who – if anyone – actually won.  We will be having another contest soon.  I will try and get that posted soon.

- DJ

The WoW Journal Comments Policy